I would like to engage in a little...
experiment. The concept involves firearms, but fortunately the only
thing we actually need for this experiment is a little time and a
little thought.
So, what is this scheme I am coming up
with? I'll tell you, I would like to examine the practical elements
of the 2nd amendment. But not in the day-in-day out aspect
of it. Lets... go off the deep end for a few minutes and talk about a
few extremes.
First of all, some ground rules.
The second amendment provides that the
rights of the people to have firearms shall not be infringed. Now,
the why of that is, well, it's up for some interpretation. One school
of through is that at the time it was written, “the people” were
the core of any likely army, so more or less they were keeping their
military armed. Another school of thought says that because a nation
has to have an army, our people should be armed so that the army
doesn't have a cakewalk if the government decides to go dictatorial.
Lets go ahead and work with that second
one for a few minutes. The idea is that an armed population could
deter the government if the government got out of hand. The evidence
of this was relatively certain, the founders had just fought and won
the American revolution, a large portion of which was fought by
farmers and reservists going against British regular infantry.
So, if we talk about governmental
deterrence as a factor in gun ownership, the logical extent of that
is to say that we need to be able to overthrow the government if
things go too far.
Now, before you jump all over me, let
me get a few things out of the way.
- I am not advocating that we violently overthrow the federal (or state) government.
- I really don't feel like arguing about how big the delta is between American civilians and the US military. The British were crack troops when they came to the US, and a bunch of farmers and peasants more or less made their lives a living hell until professional troops could be raised for a formal offensive. And in a more modern setting, how many troops did we put into Iraq and Afghanistan, and frankly, those were hardly shining examples of decisive military victories.
- I don't actually think the Federal government is going to go “King George” on us anytime soon, and frankly, I'm not interested in debating it here.
So, what is all this about?
Lets just suppose I wanted to prepare
for the worst case scenario as an American; Something happens, some
law is passed, and the next thing we know, we have a population that
suddenly isn't so keen of taking Uncle Sam's word for it. It could be
the whole country, it could be a state or two, (I can so see Texas
doing something like this). The next thing we know, we have federal
infantry taking local officials into custody, martial law is
declared, and ATF swat teams are going door to door, telling people
to turn in their guns, they are not going to need them anymore.
A formal, official, legally definable
tyranny has officially been born, the US constitution has been broken
in action, and the time has come for us to clean house back in DC.
Either that, or tell DC they can kiss our freckled butts, we're
setting out on our own.
So... what does all this have to do
with me?
Well, I'm thinking about this, and
going, “holy shit, I need to get ready for this NOW, so I'm not one
of the helpless sheep caught with my proverbial pants around his
ankles when all hell breaks loose.”
I need to get a gun!
What gun should I get?
Well, lets make a list of what it has
to do.
- Proven technology
- Good range
- decent stopping power
- cost effective (hey, unlike congress, I'm actually only spending MY money)
And as some considerations:
- Something that has some historical precedence as a combat rifle.
- A credible self defense weapon. (I mean, no point in it just being a wall ornament in the mean time)
- Something that I can reasonably threaten a soldier with.
Okay, I like that list. Let assume I
take it to heart and do some shopping. What am I going to get?
I've got some good options out there.
AR-15; Boxer and Finestine haven't
illegalized them yet, high rate of fire, respectable power... not a
bad option, but lets be real, its a bit... conspicuous.
AKM/AK-47/AK-74: hey, you want to talk
about reliability, their isn't anything wrong with an AK, it's got
more wars under it's belt than some modern armies, and let me tell
you, it's earned the respect of more armies and more governments that
I really care to count off. But... again, conspicuous, and the
ammunition isn't the best, not the best in the range department
either, and not as accurate as it could be. Good gun still, but not
my first choice.
M-14: Oh hell yes... 20
round box magazine, hardwood stock, iron sights... NATO 7.62x51mm
cartridge... I mean we're talking about the ultimate evolution of the
twentieth century battle-rifle, with a legacy that dates right back
to the old M-1 rifles of WWII. This gun is the rightful heir to
weapon that kicked butt and took names on two continents.
But.... I think the $1700 price tag is
a bit much. Hell, it's a LOT much, and it's more than I want to fork
over. Hell, it's more than I have to fork over, in spades. I'm sure I
could find one used, for a lot less, but then there is upkeep. The
M-14 is a high performance rifle and some of those parts are just
damned expensive. If I had the option of grabbing it after all hell
broke loose, you can bet your bottom dollar I would, but right now...
not so much.
So, what am I going to get? What can I
use to help overthrow a tyrannical government with some of the best
military weapons in existence at it's disposal without breaking my
meager budget? In the mean time, this thing needs to be able to help
me hold down the fort (so to speak) here a home, keep mobs as bay in
times of crisis, and … well hell, it had better be fun to shoot
too, because I need to practice on it and I don't want to dread going
to the range.
OH! Wait, I've got it!
Remington Model 700 Rifle. |
Yeah, that's right, your looking at
nothing more than a bolt action, 5 round, .30-06 rifle.
You think I'm off my my rocker?
Think again. Bolt action rifles were
how the French resistance helped make Germany's life a living hell
during the occupation, and some of own troops were using them on
the front lines all the way into the end off the second world war.
I can easily double the range of an M-4
with it, and still out range an M-16, even on its best day.
Back on the home front; no, I won't be
standing up on my roof scaring people with my wicked looking gun. But
you can bet the first time I put a live .308 through an engine block,
a lot of people might think twice before they try and Molotov my
house.
At close quarters, yeah, I'll probably
have my pistol. But then again, that stock isn't balsa wood, and I don't
need a bayonet to smash something.
I'm not going to win any firepower
contest with this thing, but then again, just by choosing a bolt
action, .308 caliber rifle, I have just put myself in a range and
reliability category that better than 90% of the US military current
infantry arsenal They can play their games, but I'll play mine.
Oh, and guess what, once all hell
breaks look, that rifle is probably going to help me get all the M-4s
I can carry. So it's not like I'm going to stick with this one option
from start to finish.
Okay back to reality.
So, why am I writing this?
No, I don't think war is going to break
out. And No, I don't think I will see the overthrow of the US
government within my life time.
This little post is an bit of a reality
check to all the people who are running around saying “They are
going to take our semi-automatic rifles and 30-round magazines away
and we won't be able to defend ourselves from the government when
they come for the rest!” (paraphrase I know, but I think we all know there are people saying this very thing right now)
The United States, more than almost any
other nation in the world, has some of the most resourceful,
dedicated and innovative people in the world. We can do more with
less than just about anyone else when we put our minds to it, but we
have to want to do it.
Now, I'm not saying we don't need
weapons like the AR pattern rifle. And more to the point, I'll be the
first to say that limiting its use will likely do little to curb
gun-related crime and death.
But there is this idea out there that
says we NEED this type of weapon to protect ourselves, and I'm here
to tell you, history shows that the most dangerous weapon is the
person with their finger on the trigger, not the mechanism the
trigger is attached to.
Ask yourself this:
Do you really need an AR-15 or an AK?
Or are you just
using it as a crutch for the fact that you don't want to practice and
get as proficient and skilled as you could be if you were using an
older design?
I don't believe in “Gun control”
for a second...
But let me tell you, I don't need space-aged technology or 90 rounds per minute to be a formidable opponent either.
if you are looking at a bolt action a Remington 700 is a fine choice. I do like my K98 WWII vintage 8mm Mauser and I believe theaction from the remington 700 is derived from the K98 Mauser. I also like the M1 carbine. it is a semi auto, accurate, light and fairly compact battle rifle.
ReplyDelete